Friday, July 10, 2009

Invisible No More



Sherry Salois prostitute Oakville Mehlville Missouri Maryville University Jeffco Jefferson County JCCC
So, let's do away with the invisibility, shall we?

25 comments:

Kvatch said...

Wait! What? Did I pop in here to find the 'Old Invisible Woman' gone? And why is the Progressive Traditionalist listed as the blog owner. So confused...

GeorgeJinkerson said...

This vulture is a stalker of the real"Invisable Woman". Though,a mistake in her life she admits,Igor hasn't stopped stalking her for over a year. Not only is he a "stalker" and a "vulture",but a "child abuser" too. I wonder, what color the trees are in his world?

Progressive Traditionalist said...

Vulture?
Who was it that hooked up with her after her dad died? Right after she broke up with her boyfriend of two years?
You're the vulture, George.

Stalker?
I have over $9000 in receipts sitting on a table in the trustee's office right now.
Those documents are public record, George.
09-44199 Sherry Ann Salois
Case type: bk Chapter: 7 Asset: No Vol: v Judge: Charles E. Rendlen III
Date filed: 05/06/2009 Date of last filing: 06/10/2009

So are these:
2107FC-03787 - ERIC MICHAEL SALOIS V SHERRY ANN SALOIS





This information is provided as a service and is not considered an official court record.
Date Filed: 04/30/2007
Location: St Louis County Case Type: FC Dissolution- w/o Children
Disposition: Consent Judgment Date of Disposition: 12/14/2007

Public record.
Compare the two.

Child abuser?
Should I write out a letter to Children's Protective Services?
Oh, but there's already that affadavit that I had prepared for the state case, and the physical evidence.
You just got it into bankruptcy a little early, so I wasn't able to enter that as evidence.

Time will come.

Anonymous said...

I'm curious about your comment, George. It seems you're a bit insecure about the status of YOUR relationship with the woman in question, but it's hard for me to tell because you grammar and sentence structure are so horrible, you're not doing a great job of communicating. You would think a guy who lives with an English teacher--even a disgraced one--would at least know how to spell invisible.

It amazes me that you have the nads to call someone else a stalker. PT is a friend of mine, and I have read the harassing emails you have been sending him. Do you realize, George, that in Missouri harassing emails ARE stalking, and you're lucky PT doesn't have you picked up and have smart ass thrown in jail (which would probably be a good place for you).

Several things are clear from your post. First, you are obviously jealous and insecure about your position in IW's life as opposed to PT's. Secondly, you are clearly an aggressisve, controlling, verbally abusive bully--in short, a Neandrathal. Thirdly, with that sort of personality, I wonder how much abuse the kids get at YOUR hands. Finally, did ever wonder how someone like YOU ended up with someone like her?

I have read the IW for several years now, and it's clear to me that she has been struggling in her life recently, and I believe that her stuggle has led to her getting more and more comfort from alcohol--possibly to the point where she has a drinking problem. You wouldn't be the kind of guy who'd take advantage of a woman with an addiction, would you? The whole world wants to know.

Sherry, or whatever your real name is, I feel so sorry for you because you have let your life go to hell to the point where you'd be with a prick like George. Since when do you let men walk on you, tell you what to do, read your email, etc? I hope that you get some professional help before you make the mistake of tying the know with that loser.

Progressive Traditionalist said...

One year ago from today, I was with Shera at the Day's Inn in Boonville. Some of the happiest days of my life.



Progressive Traditionalist said...

Truth will endure where falsity fails.

You are warned.

Progressive Traditionalist said...

...but then I come from some culture-- from the desert Southwest, mind you-- that teaches that the Strength of a Man is determined by how tightly bound he is by his Word.

GeorgeJinkerson said...

When was it you abused her sons? Does that make you feel like a "Man"?

Anonymous, you could use some proofreading, actually, and you're the one with no "nads". You're awfully brave, ANONYMOUS. I know children more mature than both of you (if there are two of you?). Igor "The Vulture" can"t defend himself? Announced any wedding plans (that never existed) at a funeral lately? You're such a bottom-dweller.

Progressive Traditionalist said...

I didn't abuse her sons.
She endangered that child's life.
Simple as that.
Endangering the child's life.
And left physical evidence behind.

"Dangerous to herself and others..."

GeorgeJinkerson said...

LOL...LOL.... Abusing yourself again? You keep me in laughter with how you make yourself lower and lower. It doesn't matter what happened a year ago, it's all irrelevant now...LOL...LOL.... I'm sorry I have your "dream girl," but she's also mine. There's nothing you can do to separate us. You're so brave, living where?

Progressive Traditionalist said...

Then laugh, you fool.
Laugh your way to Hell...

Progressive Traditionalist said...

And what is this fallacy that I should remain desirous of her?
Are you a complete fool?
Why on earth would I want to pursue something where the end is of questionable value?
Am I not more solid thatn this?
Do I not require the solid earth beneath my feet?

You fool...

GeorgeJinkerson said...

LOL..LOL...LOL....Who are you calling a fool,"FOOL". You talk like you're from England, when you're really a spineless snake from the desert.

Anonymous said...

Georgie Boy,

It's true. I left off a couple of letters, but that's worlds away from being functionally illiterate like you. Also, pricks like you who have abuse issues tend to piss me off. You can mouth off (and I'm convinced you are a windbag) all you want about "nads", but you haven't addressed the real issue. The issue is: (drumroll please) you are a cruel, controlling abuser. You are saying horrible things about PT and accuse him of being an abuser, and you can't see that it's actually you who is the abuser. In one of your emails you mentioned that you made IW get off facebook, twitter, and her blog--basically cutting off all her social contacts with anyone except you. That's the key hallmark of abusers (and cult leaders, whichever you happen to be), and IW would see that if she hadn't had some kind of trauma issue.

I promise you, George, that there are two of us, and if you keep running your smart ass mouth, you'll be certain of that fact very soon. PT is much, much nicer than I am. I don't have a problem with telling the truth as it is presented to me. I think that a good dose of truth is what you need.

I think you have been cruel to PT in your harassing emails--unnecessarily so. I think you like rubbing it in his face that you stole IW away from him, and you also try to hurt him by insulting other people in his life. As I recall, you mentioned his "nigger" girlfriend. She's actually Middle Eastern, but the fact that you'd use that word about someone he once loved--or anyone else, actually--tells me everything I need to know about you as a person, and I don't like you a bit. You're a rural Missouri redneck who thinks he's better than everyone else.If I were IW, I certainly wouldn't want you in my house with my children exposing them to that kind of hate and meanness. The IW I knew never would have allowed that to happen.

I think you're a miserable little toad of a man who thinks he's finally got it made because he landed a woman as attractive as IW when he looks like a troll. I think you're manipulative, controlling, and you'll do or say anything to keep her in your life. I also think you have low self-esteem and you say cruel things to others to help you feel better about yourself. If you don't want PT emailing or calling your girlfriend, then tell him nicely that you feel uncomfortable with that. Don't use the emails he sends as an excuse to harass him and rub it in his face and try to make him feel bad.

You need to remember that there are two people in every relationship. When a relationship goes sour, it's generally the fault of BOTH people, not just one of them. Did it ever occur to you that some of it may be her fault, too???? I guess you'll find out if she decides to dump you for the next nice guy on the internet who comes along and doesn't try to control her life.

By the way, I'm posting as anonymous because I know you've been harassing & stalking PT & I don't want you to come & stalk me, too. Most nights I sleep with a loaded AK-47 beside my bed. It's a real Russian made one, not one of the Czech pieces of shit that most Americans buy. I'm afraid, Georgie, that if you started stalking me, I'd be too sorely tempted to use it. I think that you're not worth the ream of paperwork that would come along with it, and I sure as hell wouldn't want to clean up the greasy spot. Don't even try to lull yourself into believing that it's because I'm afraid of you because I swear to you right now, it just AIN'T so, big boy. I think you're just a big ball of hot gas.

Anonymous said...

PS Invisible Woman--if you marry this loser, you'll end up hating the day you were born. It will be the biggest mistake you've ever made. I think you are a great person, and it amazes me that you feel like you have to be with someone like this. Please take some time to back away and think about this rationally. Don't rush into anything.

Anonymous said...

Poor Kvatch. You must be thoroughly confused by now. Just consider it a small nightmare, and you'll be OK.

Progressive Traditionalist said...

?????
Exactly what is the skeletal system of a snake, I wonder?

Hard to know...

Worse still is the concept that anyone--- ANYONE, mind you--- might walk up to a pueblo spouting out such nonsense as, "All you English bastards are the same."

It only proves that there is an insanity beyond laughing at.
Very disturbing....

Progressive Traditionalist said...

Pueblo faces
a lot more of them out there.

I am reminded of this scene from "Dumb and Dumber" where Jim Carrey tells his friend, "I'l take care of this;" then turns and starts speaking with a British accent to somebody there. He says, "G'day, mate!" and the other guy is just staring...

Utah Savage said...

PT you are a crazy bastard. You were a year and a half ago and you still are. Still stalking her, still taking over her life. You have no special insights. You are a blood sucker and you're ruining her life over and over.

Scarlet, get a restraining order, get a gun. Maybe better run. Every time this creep finds you again, you go silent. This is abuse. I know you are familiar with abuse. Just because it's familiar doesn't make it safe or Okay. This creep is not a good role model for the boys. He seems to see your boys as competition. This isn't good.

Progressive Traditionalist said...

Once again, you come into a situation where you know nothing and make extravagant demands.
You would do well to hear before you speak; much like a musician entering into improvisation-- they await the introduction of the voice at the appropriate time, to enter in the proper key, timing, tone, etc.
But here you are...

So, for Utah Savage, the part left unsaid:
When you were so upset about my criticism of that story, "The Crack in the Glass," I had already received that story by e-mail on 04Apr08. I'm the one that told her that she should have it published. Instead, she posted it on the internet, believing that to be "published."
No. You see, I was first published in Beyond Orion's science fiction quarterly (meaning on paper) when I was 15 years old. I later worked for a newspaper. At the interview, they requested a portfolio. I had clippings available, mainly from my college newspaper.
I would like to point out that in such an instance that providing a web address simply will not suffice.
They want clippings, ie paper.
If it's not paper, it's not worth their time or consideration.

Before this story which you were so upset about my criticism of it (which was the same as she had received privately before ruining the first rights value of it by posting it on the internet, btw), I had already received Chapters 1 - 14 of her novel, which I was assisting her in editing.
Now, supposing it were true that your opinion were so integral, why in the world were you not the one to assist in the editing of this work?
Why did I have it on my laptop?
Looks like it was all sent out on 19Mar08.

And you were so ignorant as to ask me-- a man who has written over 170 songs as well-- if I had ever tried to do anything creative....

And yet, completely ignorant of any prior agreement or any previous interaction regarding this one story, you see my private criticism made public-- and immediately go batshit crazy that anyone for any reason might speak one ill word of this woman's writing. My goal as editor was to enable her to sell the story for MONEY-- not to make Utah Savage happy by some sappy platitudes.
I will not conform to your low-mindedness.

Now, while this whole exchange was taking place, which she was privy to, according to her position in the events, not once did she choose to clarify the matter-- but instead chose to allow the animosity to continue. To what end?
What was her purpose in doing so?

You have here a person who openly admits that she has serious difficulty in engaging in genuine interactions, instead habitually interacting with people as a contrived persona or character which she has created-- a character that contains much of her own characteristics, but is markedly different.
So, what was it that this persona was attempting to accomplish in this exchange?

I don't believe that you are a bad person, Utah Savage. In fact, I have a great deal of sympathy and genuine affection for you.
However, you are an extremely brash individual that tends to rush to judgment without any perception of nuance or depth.
My wish for you is to awaken to experience the richness of a three-dimensional world.
I want you to live, and fully.
But your time is short.
Choose wisely.

How well do you know what it is that you think you're dealing with?

Progressive Traditionalist said...

Ok, Peggy, let me be very clear as to this:
Remember all of that emotional involvement and turmoil that you felt when those things were going on?
In that time that you were busy attacking me, I was on the phone with this woman 5 or 6 times a day, talking for up to an hour at times.
I would tell her that she really needed to clue you in as to what was going on behind the scenes.
She would say that your emotional involvement was-- direct verbatim quote here-- "cute."
She saw my distress as your attacks as being "funny."

Think back to how cute you felt then.
How cute do you feel now?

Now, I'm fairly certain that's not how the persona which was fabricated to engage you felt or spoke. But that's how that person behind the mask viewed things.
The blog was really a vehicle for the awkward, geeky, unpopular girl, rail-thin and titless, to finally become the head cheerleader / prom queen. She was the popular girl. And she did it by crafting characters and personas to interact with people, false people that were certain to be charming from the start. It made her impervious. The puppetmaster, that awkward neurotic behind the mask, was untouchable.

We had a series of lengthy discussions about this in late winter / early spring of 2007. As a musician, I understand persona very well. Every song is delivered from persona. It has enough personhood in it to breathe life into it, but you don't become personally attached to it. The next song comes, and with it the next persona. They get cycled through fairly quickly.

With her, it was different, because she became too dependent on them. Part of that was her anxiety, and part of it built-in negativity mechanism of her depression.
We had discussed the need for her to give up those characterizations at some point. The thing is they interfere with human interaction when they don't shut off like they're supposed to.
Personas don't need love. People do.
Personas don't need to feel a genuine connectednes-- they can't. But people do.
Those coping mechanisms that she had built for herself were coming to interfere with her capacity to progress beyond the need for them.
And she had nothing to replace them with; only misery, and forlorn and languid mists.

Utah Savage said...

You sick fuck. You are delusional. What have you published lately?

Progressive Traditionalist said...

Odd how you speak only of those things which are applicable to yourself.
Do you not see other people in this world?

Utah Savage said...

I see this: http://nvisiblewmnarchive.blogspot.com/

Progressive Traditionalist said...

What I see is a brash ignoramus that persists in speaking authoritatively on things which she knows very little about.
What I didn't see was a single one of the three comments I had left on the site; the first of which was a record of all payments, totaling $6925, made from 20Dec07 to 11Nov08; the second of which was a correction of the interest rate as shown by that red arrow (there's a different rate specifically for balance transfers right above it); and the third, I was just asking Timothy if he had gotten all of that.
But none of those comments appear to have made it through the moderation process...

But, for those who wish to verify, they might contact the federal trustee:

09-44199 Sherry Ann Salois
Case type: bk Chapter: 7 Asset: No Vol: v Judge: Charles E. Rendlen III
Date filed: 05/06/2009 Date of last filing: 06/10/2009

Trustee
A. Thomas DeWoskin
Danna McKitrick, PC
7701 Forsyth, Suite 800
St. Louis, MO 63105
(314) 889-7128
trecf@dmfirm.com
ASSIGNED: 05/06/2009

I am listed as a creditor in those schedules, btw.
That debt is involved in a set-off; meaning it has been paid in full, and then some. Quite a considerable bit, actually.

I'm working around to that.
That's where I was headed with this.
But there's still a bit more to it than that.

But nice try.
Maybe one day all your tail-chasing will enable you to inform people already in the know.

"Cute."

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

currency trading